A Tale of Two Ordinariates

I have been really grateful to those people who have sent me in short descriptions of the life and mission of their Ordinariate groups. What it reveals is what I have suspected: that there are significant differences between England and America. There is no conspiracy here, and neither side of the Atlantic has ‘got it wrong – or right’. Rather, everything that is different about our two countries including their size and history, both secular and ecclesiastical, has led to these differences. Difference sometimes makes people nervous, but understanding difference often leads to enlarged experience and fresh growth.

Thirty years ago some friends of mine went to live and work in the United States. I was fascinated by their stories of the Episcopal congregation they joined. It had been founded only the previous year, in a new area, with a priest and a group of people who had previously travelled to various other places on Sundays. The deal with the Diocese was that the priest’s stipend was paid for out of diocesan funds for five years, after which the congregation must be self sufficient. If neither numbers nor finance had grown sufficiently then the mission would be closed, and the people rerun to their previous parish(es).
When I read the accounts of Ordinariate congregations in the USA it is this model to which they aspire: church planting and church growth. It is a model which most English people from the mainline denominations hardly grasp. This is especially true among Catholic and Anglicans (though for different reasons) and the established Free Churches find themselves challenged by the newer and ethnic Christian congregations, who are greatly influenced by American models and style.
england - augustine
The reason for this difference lies in the history of Christian mission to our respective countries. The mission of St Augustine to Great Britain took place 1,400 years ago. Indeed there is evidence that Christianity arrived in our land in Roman times, and that Celtic missionaries from Ireland had established the Faith in the north before the arrival of Augustine. Once the country as a whole had converted to Christianity it became a ‘Christian country’. The Faith was not challenged but passed on from one generation to another. The land was no longer to be ‘converted’ but the Christian population, i.e. everyone, had to be pastored. This was done by setting up geographical parishes which covered the whole country, with a parish priest who celebrated the sacraments, taught the Faith to the young, and maintained Christian discipline through the confessional. The success of Augustine’s mission established firmly the authority of the Pope and brought these islands into close unity with Europe.
Even with the Protestant Reformation the pattern of a single Church remained. In the 17th century, the Stuart monarchs and the Caroline Bishops of the Church of England all struggled against religious pluralism. And this pluralism finally happened only as a political solution imposed by Parliament.
american catholic traditional
Contrast America which is a young country. It has never known anything but religious pluralism, and indeed many of its founder groups were escaping from Europe in order to worship as they themselves chose. No ecclesial body has ever been established, and there is strict separation of Church and State. Yet American remains more overtly religious that Britain and western Europe. Americans are still interested in religion, and ready to ‘shop around,’ to find that expression which appeals. The British are bored by religious faith and the younger generation know little about it: what little publicity the Church is given is usually bad or mocking. Public figures do not ‘do religion’ and celebrities and their fans regard it as distinctly uncool! Why then does Britain still have as Established Church? The reason is probably laziness on the part of the legislators, and the desire to keep at least one body of Christians safely under the thumb of Parliament. (Look at the reaction of MP’s to General Synod’s failure to approve women bishop legislation for the C of E, and Synod’s climb-down a year later.)

The UK Ordinariate is small in lay terms, though it has a substantial number of priests. Its groups are mostly not large enough to pay their priest’s stipend, and certainly not to raise the capital for their own church building. The capital reserves of the Church of England (often referred to as the Church Commissioners’ money) provided enough income to pay all the clergy salaries even when I was ordained in the 1970’s. It has been a long struggle for Anglicans in the UK to raise levels of giving. My impression is that giving is much higher in US congregations. Catholic giving in this country is not high: viability in Catholic parishes is only possible because one priest may be ministering to a congregation of 800 – 1,000 in one building.
england - anointing
The Church of England has inherited the parish structure of the Middle Ages, hugely expanding it in the 19th century, but still basing it upon the theory that it must pastor everyone within its parish boundaries. It is nonsense in urban parishes of 20,000 people, but the C of E still clings to the theory – that it is there to provide a place for two Muslims to be married (and they have a legal right to do so) should they wish, rather than evangelising them to become Christians. Catholic parishes by and large minister to Catholics, building and closing churches as the Catholic population of an area rises and falls. Anglicans have by and large, kept open enough churches to mean that those who choose can walk to church. In the cities this is usually true for Catholics as well. So, for example, from where I live in South London I can walk to three Catholic churches, with a choice of five masses every day, and sixteen masses on Sunday. Can we begin to see why the Ordinariate in the UK has been slow to open ‘new’ churches? For there must surely be a serious question about the wisdom of yet more church buildings and congregations in this country.

I have never been to the United States, but friends have described how one may drive along a main road, passing buildings belonging to every known denomination and more besides. In parts of London this is now truer than it was fifty years ago, and posters advertising this or that ‘Community Church’ often meeting in schools or factory units appear frequently in some areas. But the English have an aversion to this sort of pluralism which Americans seem not to have in the same degree. There is a memory here of the time when the Church was one, and since the beginning of the Oxford Movement in 1833 Anglo-Catholics have prayed and worked that she might be One again. The Ordinariate is for us part of Pope Benedict’s vision for unity – a daring and controversial plan to break out of the ‘ecumenical winter’.

The martyrdom of Margaret Clitherow

The martyrdom of Margaret Clitherow

In England Catholics who refused to conform in the 16th century were subject to bitter persecution. Their civil liberties were curtailed right through until the 19th century, long after those of the Protestant Dissenters. Anglo-Catholics have a deep respect therefore for the Catholic Church in this country, into which through the Ordinariate they have come into communion. They hope to bring gifts and charisms to enrich the Church, but they are certainly not here to ‘show Catholics how it’s done.’ The task of restoring England to the Faith is far too important to allow for petty squabbles between one group of another within the Catholic Church.
modern anglo-catholic worship

modern anglo-catholic worship

Finally, let me say something about the difference in the liturgical inheritance and more recent traditions which the English and American Ordinariates have. In England Cranmer’s Prayer Book was regarded, even by the High Churchmen living less than a century after him, as in need of reform. Attempts to change it were blocked by Parliament, for the Church of England itself had no independence in these matters from the State.
By contrast the American Episcopalians took their liturgical books from the Episcopal Church of Scotland, a free and largely High Church offshoot of Anglicanism. In the 19th century Oxford Movement the Prayer Book became the standard of Evangelicals in the C of E, while Anglo-Catholics sought to go behind Cranmer’s Calvinism and the controversies of the Reformation, to restore a much older (and Catholic) pattern of liturgical worship and belief in the sacraments. Importantly, American Anglo-Catholics came to associate traditional language (thee/thou forms) with orthodox belief, and modern English with the liberal interpretation of theology which was overwhelming the Episcopal Church. This association was never made in the UK. Indeed in many cathedrals and parishes where the clergy (both male and female) held advanced liberal views, the Prayer Services of Morning and Evening Prayer and the Communion were regularly held. By contrast orthodox Anglo-Catholics began to adopt, in part and after 1992 in whole, the use of the 1970 Roman Missal. Many in the Ordinariate under the age of fifty have no experience of services from the Book of Common Prayer. It has been said that the use of the Missal convinced Pope Benedict that he was dealing with people who held to Catholic belief about the Eucharist although outside the fullness of the Church.

My hope is that this analysis, subject to correction and discussion which may well come in comments to the blog, will help to identify diversity within the Ordinariates, and enable us to understand that there is no ‘one size fits all’ mission to which we are called.


About Scott Anderson

Formerly an Anglican priest (ordained 1975) received into the Catholic Church in February 2012, and ordained to the Diaconate on 27th July 2013. I took early retirement, and divide my time between London and northern France. I am deeply committed to the Ordinariate as a gift of the Holy Spirit in the search for unity. Like many Ordinariate members I feel a personal gratitude to Pope Emeritus Benedict, together with loyalty to our Holy Father, Pope Francis. My blog tries to make a small contribution to the growth of the Ordinariate by asking questions (and proposing some answers) about the 'Anglican Patrimony'. I have always been fascinated by the whole issue of growth and decline, and therefore concerned for appropriate means of evangelisation in western Europe. I believe that the Holy Spirit is constantly renewing the People of God and that we must be open to him. My love of music and motorcycles will occasionally surface in my posts. On Saturday 19th October 2013, I was ordained to the Priesthood at Most Precious Blood, Borough, by the Most Revd Peter Smith, Archbishop of Southwark, for the service of the Ordinariate of our Lady of Walsingham. I continued to serve the Ordinariate group and Parish at Most Precious Blood until the end of 2014. Subsequently, I helped in the care of the Ordinariate Groups at Hemel Hempstead and Croydon, and in the Archdiocese of Southwark, until the beginning of September 2015. With the agreement of my Ordinary, Mgr Keith Newton, the Bishop of Amiens appointed me Administrator of the Parish of Notre Dame des Etangs (Pont Remy) in Picardie, France. This appointment is to last for a year, to give the Bishop the opportunity to assess the future of the parish.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to A Tale of Two Ordinariates

  1. Harry says:

    Fr, you really have “hit the nail on the head” here and there isn’t much to say, except to point out that members of the Ordinariate in Britain now find themselves in a very unfamiliar situation of not being bound to a particular building/parish. I think for many of us the local church was very important as was the feeling of being there for everyone in the Parish, but this had the downside of so much time and effort being spent on maintaining a large number of churches in an area where other denominations had only one or at most a few congregations.
    We’ve had our discussions about patrimony, liturgy and types of groups in the Ordinariate. In all of these a common word has been mission and perhaps now is the time to put these other issues in the background and begin to consider in more detail just what the mission is that each Ordinariate group has within the wider Church. I believe that this is now the Ordinariate’s greatest challenge.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s