The recent announcement of the death, at the age of 95, of Fr Peter Peterken brought back memories of those remarkable years for Anglo-Catholics between 1992 and our reconciliation with the Catholic Church. I came to know Fr Peter through association with the Anglo-Catholic Charismatic group, meeting annually at Ditchingham and then at Walsingham. He was one of a small number of Anglican priests who combined absolute Catholic ‘soundness’ with commitment to renewal in the Holy Spirit.
I recall being next to him at a concelebrated Mass at which he was the principal Celebrant. During the Intercessions (always a lengthy business at these Masses) someone spoke in tongues. Fr Peter immediately announced that we would wait for an interpretation: if none was received then we were to take it as personal to the person concerned, and not a public word for the congregation. I remarked afterwards to another priest that I had felt myself at Corinth and next to the Apostle Paul as he ordered their Eucharistic worship!
Fr Peter was ordained before the Council and had delightful tales of his days on the Isle of Dogs in London’s East End with thriving parish life sustained by a staff of clergy. Like most Anglo-Catholic clergy of his generation he accepted and thrived in the new climate of renewal and hope for the future which came with Vatican 2. And when society and its attitude to the Faith changed in ways we could not have imagined, he remained full of hope and trust that the Spirit would inflame us to meet all challenges.
The liturgical changes which followed in the wake of the Council came as quite a shock to the Anglo-Catholics. Increasingly since the 1920’s they had modelled their liturgy in ‘strict conformity’ with the decrees of the Sacred Congregation of Rites (often stricter and certainly more elegantly than their RC confrères) Now they were faced with a dramatic simplification of the rites. They were required to celebrate with a new understanding of liturgical principle and history, and not just follow the minutiae as set out in Fortescue and O’Connell. Most of them rose to the challenge; those who did not (who clung to High Mass and the Last Gospel because ‘we like them’) were – at least behind their backs – deemed to be ‘not proper Catholics’. As the late Bishop Brian Masters reminded us, ” ‘like’ is a Protestant word.” Therein lies a lesson for the ‘traditionalists’ who have become rather too noisy in recent years.
One final question which has troubled me over the years: would the future of Anglo-Catholicism (and therefore of the whole Church of England) been rather different if the movement had been more open to Renewal in the Holy Spirit? Indeed what happened to ‘Catholic Renewal’ and its red dove?
You write “often stricter and certainly more elegantly than their RC confrères”-
I would just point to one negative RC example – the funeral Mass for John F. Kennedy celebrated by the much-loved Cardinal Cushing.
You can watch it on youtube :
What a wasted opportunity for catechesis through liturgy !!